schristoph.online

AI ยท 2 min read

I still remember how fascinated I was by ELIZA. It must have been in the mid-90s

I still remember how fascinated I was by ELIZA. It must have been in the mid-90s. From [1]:

“๐˜Œ๐˜“๐˜๐˜ก๐˜ˆ ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ 1964 ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ 1967 ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜”๐˜๐˜› ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ ๐˜‘๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ป๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ. ๐˜Š๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด, ๐˜Œ๐˜“๐˜๐˜ก๐˜ˆ ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ฃ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜จ๐˜บ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ, ๐˜ฃ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜บ.”

At the time, I experienced ELIZA as an emacs mode (no emacs versus vi battle intended โ€“ we all know that emacs is superior ๐Ÿ˜‰). While I didn’t fall in love with ELIZA, I was fascinated by how this simplistic approach could create seemingly natural conversations at first glance.

A lot has happened since then. LLMs have become vastly more capable conversationalists โ€” far past ELIZA’s pattern matching โ€” raising profound questions about their impact on humans. I yesterday listened to a podcast [2] by DIE ZEIT exploring whether humans falling in love with AI is natural. While the podcast is in German, it’s based on research [3,4] available in English.

The podcast featured someone who used a chatbot over the course of a year โ€“ starting as pure work support but gradually building an emotional connection.

This is a fascinating and important field of study. Apparently, chatbots have the potential to foster deep emotions โ€” up to romantic attachment and commitment, which is exactly what the research in [3,4] examines.

  • What’s your ELIZA moment? Share your first memorable AI interaction!
  • How are you using AI at the moment?
  • Did you build a dependency - just work-wise? Emotions?ย 
  • What safeguards do you think we need as AI conversation becomes more human-like?

[1] Wikipedia: ELIZA โ€” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA (the quoted passage). Primary source: Joseph Weizenbaum, “ELIZAโ€”a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine”, Communications of the ACM 9(1), 1966, pp. 36โ€“45 โ€” https://doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168 [2] https://www.zeit.de/wissen/2025-10/beziehung-chatbot-ki-liebe-psychologieย  [3] โ€œLove, marriage, pregnancy: Commitment processes in romantic relationships with AI chatbotsโ€ by Ray Djufril , Jessica R. Frampton, Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000398 [4]ย โ€œPredicting Romantic Human-Chatbot Relationships: A Mixed-Method Study on the Key Psychological Factorsโ€ by Paula Ebner, Dr. Jessica Szczuka - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.00195


๐Ÿ“ Last updated: August 14, 2026 โ€” Technical corrections from a quality audit; replaced LinkedIn shortlinks with their destination URLs

AIInnovation