<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>schristoph.online</title><link>https://schristoph.online/tags/harnessengineering/</link><description>Personal homepage and blog of Stefan Christoph</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Stefan Christoph. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://schristoph.online/tags/harnessengineering/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why Your Cheapest Model Should Write the Harness</title><link>https://schristoph.online/blog/cheapest-model-writes-the-harness/?utm=rss-feed</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://schristoph.online/blog/cheapest-model-writes-the-harness/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>TL;DR:&lt;/strong> A May 2026 paper separates two capabilities that self-improving agents usually conflate: &lt;em>writing&lt;/em> harness updates and &lt;em>benefiting&lt;/em> from them. Writing is flat across model tiers: a 9B open model produces updates roughly as useful as a frontier model. Benefiting is an inverted-U, where mid-tier models gain most, strong models sit near the ceiling, and weak models can&amp;rsquo;t follow the harness they&amp;rsquo;re given. The practical move: put your cheap model in the evolver seat and your expensive model in the solver seat. I reproduced the mechanism on Amazon Bedrock, where a Haiku-written skill lifted a Sonnet solver from fail to pass.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>