2026
- Weekly Review: Oct 12–18, 2026
TL;DR: Five posts this week, and in most of them the part that decides the outcome sits outside the frame you were looking at. The sender stares at the silence, while the real cause is the receiver’s …
- What Doesn't Close
What Doesn’t Close “Mmmhh, da haste dir aber nen Thema ausgesucht & ich hoffe sehr, dass du dabei im Kopf behältst, wie wenig sich Asymmetrien letzten Endes vermeiden lassen. Ganz ähnlich, wie …
- You Remember Every Word. They Got 200 Messages.
TL;DR: You spent an hour on the message. They gave it four seconds, somewhere between message 87 and message 88 of their day. Then you waited, and in the silence you built a story: they read it, …
- Weekly Review — Oct 5–11, 2026
TL;DR: Six posts this week, and most of them ask the same question from different seats: who carries the consequence of a decision, and can they see it? A line in a reorg plan that the planners can …
- One Side Rates, the Other Can't Answer
TL;DR: You gave it three stars. “It was fine.” To you that was an opinion, tapped out at a red light and forgotten by dinner. To the person on the other end it was a mark on a permanent, aggregated …
- The Door Only Locks Behind One of You
The Door Only Locks Behind One of You TL;DR: The same decision can be a two-way door for the person making it and a one-way door for the person it lands on. The decider can revisit, rehire, roll back; …
- Weekly Review — Sep 28–Oct 4, 2026
TL;DR: Five posts this week, and four of them circle the same uncomfortable pattern: people often judge what they can see rather than what is there. Visible effort can count for more than equally …
- The Iceberg Problem
TL;DR: You are judged by the effort other people can see, not the effort you actually spend. That gap is the iceberg: whoever evaluates you sees the tip and none of the mass below the waterline. The …
- Being Someone's Option
TL;DR: When one side is all-in and the other is still exploring, the exploring side holds the power, and not because they are cooler or stronger. It is an equation. Rusbult’s investment model says …
- The Expert Can't Remember Not-Knowing
TL;DR: In 1990 a Stanford researcher had people tap the rhythm of a famous song on a table and predict how many listeners would name it. The tappers guessed 50%. The real number was 2.5%. The tapper …
- The Feedback Exchange Rate
TL;DR: Feedback runs on a hidden exchange rate. The giver spends five minutes on a remark and moves on; the receiver spends three weeks re-reading it, because bad lands heavier than good and the mind …
- Asymmetry of Stakes: Staying Humane at Volume
TL;DR: To the recruiter it’s interview #40 this month. To you it’s the next five years of your life. Both readings are correct, and that gap is the problem. When one side lives an event at volume and …
- The Psychology of "We'll Call You"
TL;DR: “We’ll call you” turns a relationship into an asymmetric wait: one side owns the timeline and the information, the other can only sit with it. Decades of research explain why the silence often …