Wo drรผckt der Schuh?' - ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐: '๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐ต?' ๐๐๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐, ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐
Wo drรผckt der Schuh?" - ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐: “๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐ต?” ๐๐๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐, ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐’๐ ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ผ๐? ๐๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐ ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ. ๐
The only constant in life is change. But how do we deal with it? ๐ค
Change provides energy โก - new things to explore, fresh perspectives to discover.
Change drains energy ๐ - we need to adapt, learn, and get comfortable with the unfamiliar.
Humans are creatures of habit. Even if you’re naturally curious (at Amazon, there’s a dedicated leadership principle “Learn and be Curious” - but let’s not get sidetracked here ๐), you still have your routines. Changing those requires energy.
So a natural reaction to change is pushback. And not all change is good! Sometimes pushback - here we go with Amazon leadership principles again: “Have Backbone; Disagree and Commit” - is the right and only reaction. Other times, we need to overcome our resistance and move forward.
What to do when?
The consulting answer: It depends. ๐คทโโ๏ธ
In a discussion with my dear colleague Diana, we came up with this analogy:
๐๐’๐ ๐น๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐ฒ๐. First, you look at them and might like them or not - that’s the first moment you encounter change. You can decide not to try them, but you’ll never know if they would have been perfect. Same with change: you need to unpack it to understand it.
Once you slip into the shoe, it might be super comfortable - or not. Even if it’s uncomfortable, maybe those are just minor issues that will disappear once you break them in. Maybe not. ๐ค Also, a shoe can feel amazing in the store but turn out to be terrible once you actually wear it. You really need to try!
๐๐ถ๐ด ๐ฝ๐ถ๐๐ณ๐ฎ๐น๐น ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฏ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ผ๐ฒ๐ (๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ): ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ถ๐๐ป’๐ ๐๐ผ๐ผ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ถ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป๐, ๐๐ผ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ถ๐ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ ๐ถ๐. ๐ ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ต๐ถ๐น๐ฒ, ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ’๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ผ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ณ - ๐ฎ๐ป๐ผ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ - ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ณ๐ถ๐. ๐ฌ๐ผ๐’๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐๐! ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฝ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป! ๐
==> ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ?ย ==> ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐ฒ๐? ๐
P.S.: While discussing this analogy, we realized there might be some gender-specific aspects to it. Also, being a mountain guy with a gazillion pairs of shoes for different purposes, I think about fitting shoes a little differently than others. But this might be the nucleus for another post - or some good fun in the comments below! โฐ๏ธ๐
Cross-posted to LinkedIn